2006 / Martin Campbell > Casino Royale is the best Bond film since 1969’s On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. It has style, grit, heart and a story that actually works. All too often, I’ve found my attention fading by the 7th inning stretch. Chases and shootouts mean considerably less if there’s no plausible reason behind them. And by plausible, it’s not just how it affects the global power paradigm, of the good versus the bad, but rather how humane and reasonable the motivations are. And while I’m not a fan of Paul Haggis, maybe it was his screenwriting touch that made this happen. (One could probably argue that the subject matter kept his heavy-handedness in check, and if that’s true, I do look forward to him working on the next Bond film.)

As for Daniel Craig, the man is not Sean Connery. And that is exactly why he works. While Clive Owen would have been my first choice for Brosnan’s replacement, Craig has shown that he fits the bill, much like the tailored suit that Vesper Lynd prepares for him. His youth reflects appropriately in what is the beginning of 007. The screenplay supports him throughout, offering us more insight into his character than ever before. Eva Green is nearly perfect as Vesper Lynd, and arguably the best and most complex Bond girl since Jane Seymour’s Solitaire in Live and Let Die. Her onscreen chemistry with Craig is one of the key reasons the film works so well.

Casino Royale has me more excited about the future of James Bond than I’ve ever been. The style seems to be going the right direction, Daniel Craig is an excellent fit and they’ve finally taken to writing a properly thought-out script. It would be wonderful to see an arch-nemesis of sorts, similar to Blofeld, as well as further background on Bond himself. Either way, the next Bond, rumored to be a loose continuation of Casino Royale, is now on my calendar for 2008.